I’m going to talk about polyamory, but before I do, I want to clarify what it means and how it’s different from an open connection. People today have a tendency to mix up these two phrases or mash them together.
Open relationship generally means that you are either pair-bonded to a woman and are permitted to have a bit on the side (OLTR in my parlance) or it means you’ve got a primary woman (such as a spouse or”main girl”) and you are permitted to date other girls provided they do not completely override your main girl (high-end MLTR in my parlance).
Polyamory is rather different. It means you are not emotionally exclusive to any 1 person in any respect. You are in sexual and intimate relationships with at least two people. This is comparable to MLTRs in my parlance, but not quite since with full size polyamory you can (and usually do) have multiple girlfriends and one or more of the girls have several boyfriends (as well as husbands).
Open relationships are great, polyamory is very good, pair-bonding is fantastic, having multiple connections is terrific. It’s all good, baby. As I’ve said countless times, anything is less bad than long-term sexual monogamy, which does not work in any way. Anything that lets you have regular sex with at least two girls is less bad than needing to only have sex with you, which isn’t only stupid, but anti-freedom and anti-masculine.
Now that we have that context, allow me to show you a little trick people use to party polyamory.
Some man will link to an article or video profiling a polyamorous threesome. The situation is always the same: the threesome introduced is comprised of an ugly Dominant and two skinny, dorky, wimpy, needy, oneitis-stricken beta men. The Dominant, sitting between her two boyfriends, will speak about how good it is to have those two slaves do anything she wants. Both betas cheerfully nod in agreement and wax on about how wonderful she is and how blessed they are to have this wonderful girlfriend.
The man linking to this shitshow will then announce,”See? Look at this! Look at both of these pussies! Look at how destitute and beta they’re for this ugly bitch! This is polyamory, people! Look good to you? See everybody? There is the evidence: POLYAMORY IS FOR BETAS! Fuck polyamory!
He many continue, giving the typical right-wing Guy-Disney information about how you will need to monogamously marry some young Christian woman in her early twenties who has not fucked too many men yet then boss her around for the rest of her life such as the large, powerful, Christian Alpha you wish you were (in spite of the fact that guys doing this endure a 76%+ divorce rate exactly like anyone else that gets traditionally married nowadays ).
The problem with this strategy is clear. Would some of my readers even think about a polyamorous relationship where you only dated one woman and she dated other guys? Thousands and thousands of guys read my articles; I doubt I could find among them who would believe this is an excellent idea and recommend it to others. Being in such a connection are the opposite of being an Alpha 2.0.
I just said above that any connection which lets you have regular sex with at least two girls is less bad than just having sex with you. These beta men in this beta male model of polyamory are just having sex with one woman. They’re blowing the whole point of non-monogamy. They are doing that because, naturally, they are betas.
Individuals who point at this beta male model of polyamory as the illustration of polyamory or all non-monogamy are liars. This sort of connection is literally the opposite of the way I live and the reverse of what I recommend.
Contrary to monogamy, non-monogamy is a large umbrella that encompasses several distinct kinds of relationships, all which I explain in my novels but only certain ones that I think are a fantastic idea for men. For Instance, I believe FB, MLTR and OLTR are Amazing. I think swinging is not that good but can work for certain men and women. I believe beta man polyamory (described above) is disgusting and destructive. All these things are non-monogamy but lots of these items are so radically different they are considered opposites. Really, my sex life is as diametrically opposite of beta man polyamory as you can get and has been for nearly 14 years now.
Can I against beta man polyamory? For me and you, yes. But maybe not for betas. As I’ve mentioned many times, beta men are fucked no matter what they do. I know, because I was one. Monogamy/polyamory/open relationships/dating/single/alone; ALL of those situations will suck for you if you are a beta. It is a part of being a beta. That is why you betas should put in a couple of years and update yourselves to Alpha 2.0 so that you can begin living the great life and really be long-term happy. I have done a long time ago and it was actually the best decision of my entire life.
The trouble with this variant of beta man polyamory on display is not non-monogamy, it is beta men. As Western culture continues to fall and monogamy gets less popular, more people will assume non-monogamous lifestyles, that is great. The issue is most of those men will be betas since most modern-day Western guys (around 75 percent ) are betas already. Worse, beta men are a growing demographic. With each generation beginning with the Millennials afterward Generation Z and those after that, you are likely to see less Alphas and more betas.
Less monogamy + more betas = a good deal of really fucked-up, woman-centric, non-monogamous relationships where the girls will be in charge.
For betas, yes (but they are fucked anyway). For society, it is very bad (but Western culture is also fucked anyway). But for me and you? No. The more guys getting sucked up into polyamorous relationships which include numerous men but just 1 woman, the less competition we Alpha Males have. That includes not just Alpha Man 2.0s but also my enterprising Alpha Male 1.0 brothers.
Each time I see one of those beta man polyamory people profiled, I wince in disgust but I smile and rub my hands together evilly like a James Bond villain. Let these betas get removed from the pool by below-average-looking Dominant girls while I move in on the sexy girls who have less betas to kiss their asses or take them out on overpriced dinner dates. Win.
Next time you see anyone pointing at beta man polyamory as the norm for non-monogamy recognize A) how wrong that is; B) how great it really is… for us.